Diageo wins case against Vodkat

19 January, 2010

Intercontinental Brands has lost a legal battle to sell its 22% abv speciality spirit under the Vodkat brand name.

The court ruling comes after Diageo launched legal action against ICB in 2008, claiming it was passing off Vodkat as full-strength vodka.

The EU’s definition of vodka states that it must be at least 37% abv.

Despite ICB changing the packaging of Vodkat to include the description “schnapps” next to the brand name, the judge ruled that the product was guilty of misleading consumers into believing they were buying a real vodka.

ICB director Paul Burton said: “While we are disappointed with the decision, we want to reassure our customers that we will continue to supply our Vodkat schnapps product to them. We are considering the branding issues carefully.”

He suggested the possibility of including a sub-descriptor on packaging “to further explain what a schnapps is”.

Diageo GB’s marketing director Philip Almond said: “The decision confirms as correct our view that vodka is a protectable category under the law of passing off, in the same way as whisky and Champagne, and that the brand name Vodkat, and the way it has been used, is likely to have resulted in substantial numbers of consumers being misled into thinking Vodkat is vodka, when it is not.

“This landmark case will also ensure that the vodka category can be protected from other vodka-lookalike products both now and in the future.”




Bookmark this


Site Search

COMMENT

The shops that stand out from the madding crowd

The judges met last week to sort out the winners in the independent categories of our 2018 Drinks Retailing Awards. The results are top secret until the awards dinner on February 6 but it’s giving nothing away to report that the overall standard of those that will be revealed in the shortlist of finalists in the January issue of DRN is higher than it’s ever been.

Click for more »
Upcoming events

Polls

Is blended Scotch overshadowed by single malt in retailers?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Don't know

Twitter